Skip navigation

There's a Reason Why You Have Coverage and Your Buddy Doesn't

Cognitive Bias and the Insurance Market

Ramón Salinas

Senior Strategist, EPAM Continuum
Blog
  • Insurance

Selling insurance is hard. Period. While the value of having some degree of protection is obvious to some, to others forgoing coverage is the more comfortable option. The insured camp will often look at the uninsured in a condescending way, viewing them as people suffering from poor judgement and lack of information. In fact, there can be strong forces at play, ones that deeply influence people’s blind spots and values, when it comes to buying, or not buying, insurance.

Governments make a tremendous effort to promote insurance, from education initiatives to facilitating or subsidizing access (ACA for healthcare in the U.S., SOAP for third-party liability for drivers in Chile, etc.). Considering Healthcare insurance alone Gallup recently reported that more than three million Americans entered the ranks of the uninsured in 2017. Why? Why must governments and companies work so hard to promote a product that’s seemingly so beneficial for consumers? Why does the notion of insurance violate core modes of thinking for some and not others?

Surprisingly, when looking for patterns in uninsured populations, this behavior appears to be independent of type of insurance—it’s the same for life- car-, health insurance, etc.—socioeconomic level, and gender. Obvious culprits are hard to find, as people will provide a wide range of reasons for why insurance is not for them. Two well-known phenomena that have been masterfully documented by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky—loss aversion and status quo bias—work to reinforce the idea that everybody ought to seek instruments that help protect their life and assets. Briefly: People crave familiarity. They prefer avoiding losses to chasing potential gains and would rather stick to previous decisions than change their current situation.

From our extensive work reimagining insurance products and services in the United States and abroad, we’ve identified a series of cognitive biases that tend to repeat over time. We run into the same reasons why people choose, over and over, not to pay for insurance. Primarily, they’re tied to people’s perceptions of the value of insurance, and not to any opposition to giving up disposable income or any other non-fiscal limitation. Below are some of the most common ones, and how to spot them.

Illusion of control bias. Probably the most predominant of optimistic biases is a misguided tendency to overestimate one’s capacity to influence the outcome of certain events. For instance, when assessing how much defensive driving can impact the probability of getting into a car accident, people then to overrate how much control they have.

How people express this. “If I eat healthy and exercise frequently, I won’t die young. I’ll get life insurance when I’m really old,” or “If I keep my smoking to under a pack a month, the chances of getting lung cancer are minimal.”

Anecdotal fallacy and negativity bias. Using isolated examples to form opinions in lieu of solid evidence can lead to poor decisions for obvious reasons. There is often as much information to prove a theory as information that will disprove it, so proximity to a story carries disproportionate weight in forming our opinions. To make matters worse, negative stories—such as claims not being paid because of hidden clauses written on fine print—tend to stick and get shared more than stories of people benefitting from having insurance.

How people express this. “My friend’s cousin died, and his wife did not get a penny from his life insurance company”

Adverse selection. Many people know, or intuit, that insurance companies operate with imperfect information, because clients might be knowingly or unknowingly be withholding information from them, so they have to incorporate “corrective” factors into their models to adjust for what they don’t know. Consequently, people believe that often “the innocent end up paying for the sins of the guilty,” rendering them less inclined to participate in a system that does not necessarily recognize their position above the mean, when it comes to important behaviors or conditions.

How people express this. “Health insurance is not for healthy people”

Ambiguity effect. Since life is filled with unknowns, we naturally tend to look for certainties. As insurance is essentially a promise, a maybe-I’ll-one-day-need-this-maybe-I-won’t value proposition, it is easier to default to skepticism about the likelihood of actually benefiting from any policy. Some people think that because they never needed it (or because of the high copay, or a particular case wasn’t covered, and many other reasons) they would rather not deal with the ambiguity at all, and instead save money on their own.

How people express this. “I know something bad may happen. But you never know if the insurer will honor their commitment. On the contrary, I can see and count the money that I save for a rainy day.”

Bandwagon effect. Taking up running because everyone else is doing so may be a fine reason to start. Buying a pair of sneakers without thoughtful consideration, simply because that’s what your friends are wearing, is also pretty innocuous. However, choosing an unproven medical treatment because of its popularity is probably a bad idea. And yet, if everyone around you deems insurance as a waste of money, the likelihood of you starting to believe the same is high, thus adding a significant barrier to a potential buying decision.

How people express this. “In this region we don’t do __ insurance!” or “None of my friends have insurance, so why should I?”

Companies that dare go beyond industry orthodoxies, such as the revolutionary renter & home insurance startup Lemonade in the U.K.—one that includes renowned behavioral psychologist Dan Ariely in its team—understand that increasing the size of the pie is possible. At Continuum, we completely agree. Taking a human-centered approach first and intentionally addressing cognitive biases to design products that counteract or play into them, can help change attitudes and behavior related to insurance, and provide something of value to those that have excluded themselves from this market.

You can find the original article here.

Hello. How Can We Help You?


Our Offices

  • Canada

    • Ottawa

      343 Preston Street,
      ON K1S 1N4, Ottawa
      Canada

      Map
    • Toronto

      5 Park Home Avenue,
      Suite 400,
      ON M2N 6L4, North York,
      Toronto
      Canada

      Map
      F: +1-416-595-1551
  • Mexico

    • Guadalajara

      Periférico Sur #8110,
      Col. El Mante
      45609 Tlaquepaque, Jalisco
      Mexico

      Map
  • United States

    • Newtown, PA

      41 University Drive,
      Suite 202,
      Newtown, PA 18940
      USA

      Map
      F: +1-267-759-8989
    • Bellevue, WA

      110 110th Ave. NE,
      Suite 310
      Bellevue, WA 98004
      USA

      Map
    • Boston, MA

      21 Drydock Avenue,
      Suite 410 W,
      Boston, MA 02210
      USA

      Map
    • Conshohocken, PA

      101 East 8th Ave,
      Suite 201,
      Conshohocken, PA 19428
      USA

      Map
    • Los Angeles, CA

      11601 Wilshire Blvd,
      Suite 350,
      Los Angeles, CA 90025
      USA

      Map
    • New York, NY

      24 West 25th Street,
      5th Floor,
      New York, NY 10010
      USA

      Map
      F: +1-267-759-8989
    • Philadelphia, PA

      30 South 15th Street,
      9th Floor,
      Philadelphia, PA 19102
      USA

      Map
    • San Francisco, CA

      222 Kearny Street,
      Suite 308,
      San Francisco, CA 94108
      USA

      Map
    • Washington D.C.

      7901 Jones Branch Drive,
      Suite 400,
      McLean, VA 22102
      USA

      Map
  • Australia

  • China

    • Guangzhou

      Unit B01, 23/F,
      Yuexiuxinduhui Building,
      No. 236, 6th Zhongshan Road,
      Yuexiu District, Guangzhou,
      China 510180

      Map
    • 广州

      中国广州市越秀区
      中山六路236号
      越秀新都会大厦中座 23楼 B01室
      邮编510180

      地图
    • Shanghai

      Room B509, 5th Floor,
      48 Weihai Road,
      Huangpu District, Shanghai,
      China 200000

      Map
    • 上海

      上海市黄浦区
      威海路48号
      5楼B509室
      邮编200000

      地图
    • Shenzhen

      3/F, Block 5, Vision Shenzhen Business Park,
      9th Gaoxin South Road, 
      Shenzhen Hi-tech Industrial Park,
      Nanshan District, Shenzhen,
      Guangdong, China 518057

      Map
    • 深圳

      中国广东省深圳市
      南山区高新南九道
      威新软件园5号楼3楼
      邮编518057

      地图
    • Suzhou

      Building 12, Creative Industrial Park,
      328 Xinghu Street,
      Suzhou Industrial Park,
      Suzhou, China 215123

      Map
    • 苏州

      中国江苏省苏州市
      苏州工业园区星湖街328号
      创意产业园内12号楼
      邮编215123

      地图
  • Hong Kong

    • Hong Kong

      26F&17F, The Wellington Tower,
      198 Wellington Street,
      Central, HK

      Map
  • India

    • Bangalore

      Smartworks,  
      Global Technology Park,
      Block C, Outer Ring Rd,
      Adarsh Palm Retreat, Bellandur,
      Bengaluru, Karnataka 560103
      India

      Map
    • Hyderabad

      10, 11 & 12th Floors,
      Salarpuria Sattva Knowledge City,
      Plot No. 2, Phase - 1,
      Survey No. 83/1,
      Raidurgam Village,
      Serilingampally Mandal,
      Hyderabad, Telangana - 500081
      India

      Map
    • Pune

      SmartWork Business Center Pvt Ltd,
      Suite 8, Level 1,
      West Wing, Nyati Unitree,
      Samrat Ashok Road,
      Yerwada, Pune - 411006,
      Maharashtra
      India

      Map
  • Japan

    • Tokyo

      Floor 1-10-11
      Shibadaimon Centre Building 10th
      Shibadaimon Minato-ku
      Tokyo 105-0012
      Japan

      Map
      F: +81-03-6880-9201
  • Singapore

    • Singapore

      5 Shenton Way
      UIC Building, #10-01,
      Singapore (068808)

      Map
  • United Arab Emirates

    • Dubai

      EPAM Systems FZ-LLC Dubai Branch
      2307 Arenco Tower, Dubai Media City
      PO Box 501929 Dubai
      United Arab Emirates

      Map