Skip navigation EPAM
Dark Mode
Light Mode

The next AI race isn't about finding more cyber threats. It's about fixing them faster.

In the News

EPAM – by Karl Ots and Christopher Thatcher

The next AI race isn't about finding more cyber threats. It's about fixing them faster.

As AI condenses the time between vulnerability and exploitation, engineering-driven cyber resilience has become the foundation for secure enterprise AI.

Written by Karl Ots, Managing Principal, Head of Cloud & AI Security, and Christopher Thatcher, Director, Cybersecurity Solutions at EPAM Systems, Inc.

Key takeaways 

  • AI has compressed the time between vulnerability discovery and exploitation, but remediation has not kept pace, shrinking the window to reduce risk and making business-as-usual security operations no longer viable.
  • When cyber incidents can halt business operations, cybersecurity is no longer just an IT problem; it is a critical business continuity and resilience challenge.
  • To keep pace with AI-driven threats, organizations must transition from siloed, reactive security departments to integrated, continuous, engineering-led remediation workflows.

Traditional vulnerability management was built for a world that no longer exists. For decades, cybersecurity has followed a familiar playbook, defined mainly by time, resources and prioritization. Organizations have constantly discovered more vulnerabilities than they could realistically remediate, forcing security teams to address the highest-risk issues first while carrying the remaining backlog forward. That was based on the assumption that not every lower-severity vulnerability represented an immediate threat. Frontier AI has fundamentally changed that equation. AI can rapidly identify and chain together multiple lower-risk vulnerabilities into high-impact attack paths, shrinking the time between discovery and exploitation and making yesterday's backlog today's business risk. 

This is why AI-native cyber resilience is fundamentally an engineering challenge, not simply a security challenge. AI is accelerating vulnerability discovery, exploitation development and attack execution at a scale and speed that traditional security operations were never designed to match. Defending against machine-speed attacks requires more than faster detection or better prioritization. It requires AI-native engineering practices that embed cyber resilience directly into how software is designed, built, tested and operated. Engineering organizations must continuously understand exposure, remediate risk safely within software delivery workflows and verify that those risks have been eliminated. As the window between discovery and exploitation shrinks from months to days, hours or even minutes, the organizations that succeed won't simply innovate faster. They will be the ones who engineer resilience into the way they build, deploy and operate software.

Cybersecurity Has Become a Business Continuity Issue

The rise of AI-powered cyber threats marks a fundamental shift in enterprise risk. With the rapid compression between discovery and exploitation, security is no longer a problem just for the CISO; it has become a business continuity challenge that directly affects operational resilience, regulatory compliance and customer trust. While cyber incidents have long carried serious consequences, organizations have increasingly experienced attacks capable of disrupting critical operations rather than simply degrading them. As a result, cybersecurity has moved beyond the IT organization to become a strategic business continuity and resilience issue for executive leadership and the board. Recent years have provided multiple examples of supply chain disruption, halted business operations, and, in some cases, government intervention, underscoring the real-world consequences of cyber risk at enterprise scale.

“Cybersecurity is no longer just an IT problem. The potential severity of cyber incidents, together with increasingly enforceable regulatory obligations, has elevated responsibility from IT and security teams to executive leadership and the Board," said Miroslav Sklansky, Chief Information Security Officer at EPAM. “Leaders need a clear understanding of material exposure, its potential impact on business continuity and whether the organization has the engineering capacity to respond before risk becomes disruption.” 

Security Meets Engineering, Thanks to AI

If AI has compressed the pace of cyber risk, then the need for security to evolve is imminent. The old model, where security sat beside engineering, cloud and application development as a separate function, was built for a different era. Today, that separation creates friction between identifying risk and fixing it, leaving organizations with growing backlogs of vulnerabilities as software continues to move into production.

This is not simply a security modernization initiative. It is a fundamental shift in how enterprises engineer resilience. As AI is integrated directly into the software development lifecycle, increased visibility and real-time governance are needed to understand identities, applications, data and infrastructure across increasingly complex environments. But visibility alone does not create resilience.

Building cyber resilience requires more than identifying vulnerabilities; it also depends on how quickly those findings can be mitigated, continuously, in an ever-evolving technology landscape. The native technical depth required to build true cyber resilience essentially demands that security become an engineering-first approach, one built around how modern organizations actually develop, deploy and operate applications. When security becomes an engineering capability rather than a separate function, organizations can innovate faster without sacrificing resilience.

Cloud environments provide an early view of what this new reality looks like. Because modern infrastructure is defined and managed as code, cloud security has already exposed the limits of traditional, human-driven security operations. Unified visibility across cloud environments is needed to understand which risks matter most, but it also requires the engineering discipline to translate those insights into prioritized, validated remediation delivered through existing development workflows.

Organizations must be able to translate security findings into prioritized, validated fixes that move through the same engineering workflows used to build and operate software. That means embedding security and governance from the outset, replacing reactive patching and disconnected security programs with continuous, engineering-led remediation.  Cloud security becomes more than a control layer; it becomes the foundation that enables trusted, scalable AI transformation.

Closing the Remediation Gap

Even enterprises that understand the need for infrastructure, security practices and engineering workflows to operate as one unified discipline, with AI as the catalyst, are still only improving one half of the security issue. While AI-enabled security solutions may improve threat detection, automate initial assessments and streamline response actions, the need for faster remediation is still necessary. 

This is the principle behind EPAM's AI-native cyber resilience approach: helping organizations move beyond fragmented risk detection toward continuous, engineering-led risk reduction. By leveraging AI to generate and validate repairs and ensuring the right people are providing oversight and judgment calls, enterprises become capable of reducing risk before it becomes disruption, without slowing innovation or compromising operational resilience, regulatory confidence or customer trust. That is the future EPAM is helping clients build.

"The future of AI governance isn't about slowing innovation, it's about ensuring governance can operate at the same speed as intelligent systems," said Adam Auerbach, VP, Head of Applied AI, NA at EPAM. "Organizations that embed governance directly into engineering workflows will be better positioned to innovate confidently while maintaining trust, security and compliance."

A True Zero-Trust Architecture

This end-state, where AI continuously scans, repairs, and tests systems, with the right people providing oversight and judgment calls, requires more than a single security platform or isolated security initiatives; it necessitates complex, sophisticated engineering competencies, applied strategically based on enterprise need. At EPAM, our AI-native cyber resilience approach is built around four core capabilities:

  • Continuous Risk Transparency – Delivering real-time visibility into application risk posture, remediation progress and exposure to emerging AI threats. 
  • Asset & Dependency Discovery – Creating an intelligent, continuously updated view of applications, software components, open-source dependencies and third-party suppliers to better understand concentration risk and software supply chain exposure. 
  • Security Debt Remediation – Applying engineering-led, risk-based prioritization to systematically reduce exploitable vulnerabilities and eliminate security debt at enterprise scale. 
  • Secure AI Engineering – Embedding AI-powered code review, continuous security testing and automated vulnerability validation directly into modern software delivery, ensuring security evolves alongside engineering rather than slowing it down. 

Only once an organization integrates these capabilities can it move beyond reactive security programs to build a resilient, AI-ready business model that can innovate with confidence while not risking it all.

Related Reading: The companies winning AI aren't choosing better models. They're building better teams.

FEATURED STORIES